Technology, Care Coordination, and Community Resources Considerations Capella 4900 Assessment 4

Capella 4900 Assessment 4 Patient Family or Population Health Problem Solution

In terms of cost reduction, the proposed intervention focuses on preventive strategies and proactive management of T2D, which can lead to significant savings for the healthcare system and Jonathan individually. Preventing complications through education, monitoring, and early intervention can lessen the need for expensive hospital stays, ER visits, and long-term care services (Powers et al., 2020). Moreover, by leveraging technology and community resources, the intervention optimizes resource utilization and minimizes unnecessary healthcare expenditures, such as transportation costs and missed workdays for Jonathan and his family (Powers et al., 2020).

The American Diabetes Association’s established benchmarks can guide healthcare professionals in evaluating the success of the proposed intervention. The ADA describes HbA1c levels less than 5.7% to be normal (American Diabetes Association, 2023). If the patient shows HbA1c levels greater than or equal to 6.5%, diabetes is present (American Diabetes Association, 2023). Using these benchmarks, Jonathan’s diabetes can be monitored continuously through the use of CGMs. 

Technology, Care Coordination, and Community Resources Considerations

In addressing a patient’s health problem, such as Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) as exemplified by Jonathan, the integration of technology, care coordination, and community resources can significantly enhance patient outcomes. Technological advancements, including Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) systems and telemedicine, offer remote monitoring and consultation capabilities, facilitating timely interventions and patient education (Lin et al., 2021). Moreover, effective care coordination ensures seamless communication among healthcare providers, optimizing treatment plans and preventing gaps in care delivery (Chen et al., 2022).

Using community resources, like support groups and educational initiatives, offers extra avenues for patient empowerment and holistic disease management (Campbell & Egede, 2019). Together, these approaches create a comprehensive framework for addressing T2D, supported by evidence demonstrating improved patient adherence, reduced hospitalizations, and better health outcomes.

Conclusion

In summary, the proposed intervention for Jonathan’s Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) management underscores the significance of integrating technology, care coordination, and community resources to enhance patient outcomes. By utilizing Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) systems, telemedicine, and diabetes education programs, Jonathan’s care can be optimized, leading to improved quality of care, patient safety, and reduced healthcare costs. The intervention aligns with nursing standards and governmental policies, ensuring evidence-based, patient-centered care. Additionally, emphasizing patient collaboration highlights the importance of tailoring interventions to individual needs. Overall, the proposed intervention offers a promising approach to address Jonathan’s T2D management comprehensively, promoting better health outcomes and quality of life.

References

Agastiya, I. M. C., Kurianto, E., Akalili, H., & Wicaksana, A. L. (2022). The impact of telehealth on self-management of patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review on interventional studies. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, 16(5), 102485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2022.102485